Lea Boskovic vs Anna Bondar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W W W W L
Form
L W W L L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Boskovic 1 - 0 Bondar
They have played 3 sets in total, with Boskovic winning 2 and Bondar winning 1. The last match between Boskovic and Bondar was at the W25 Otocec, 04-06-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Lea Boskovic getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lea Boskovic | 1 |
| Anna Bondar | 0 |
W25 Otocec(04-06-2021)
6
3
4
6
6
1
| Boskovic | Stats | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (8-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (11-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 190 | Ranking | 102 |
| 158 | Highest Rank | 50 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 18 |
| 60% (242-162) | Career Total W/L | 63% (414-245) |
| $41,000 | Career Prize Money | $623,501 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Lea Boskovic
Player
Anna Bondar
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:18:0 | Average Match Time | 2:18:0 |
| 73% (58/79) | 1st Serve % | 65% (51/78) |
| 66% (38/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (30/51) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 46% (36/78) | Return Points Win % | 38% (30/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lea Boskovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Lea Boskovic
44%
(
32 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Cristina Bucsa
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Irina Maria Bara
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
52%
(
36 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Emanuela Lares
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sara Daavettila
Player
Lea Boskovic
66%
(
88 of
133)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
6
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
49%
(
65 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
65 of
118)
133
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
66%
(
73 of
110)
1st Serve %
50%
(
59 of
119)
0
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
10
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
112
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Lea Boskovic
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
30
Total Points Won
24
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Nagi Hanatani
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Bondar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Anna Bondar
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Anna Bondar
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Francisca Jorge
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Anna Bondar
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Mona Barthel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Anna Bondar
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
64)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (242/162) | Win/Loss | 63% (414/245) |
| 58% (533/392) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (922/590) |
| 53% (4514/3977) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7610/6452) |
| 63% (30/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (82/66) |
| 60% (164/108) | Clay Win/Loss | 69% (306/140) |
| 58% (46/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (26/33) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/6) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 332 | Aces Total | 2036 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 789 | Total Double Faults | 1135 |
| 1:40:27 | Average Match Time | 1:28:14 |
| 463.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 430.99 |
| 72% (19337/26679) | 1st Serve % | 59% (22605/38407) |
| 59% (11395/19337) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (14902/22605) |
| 45% (3310/7342) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7576/15802) |
| 49% (1738/3541) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2185/4680) |
| 47% (12653/26823) | Return Points Win % | 44% (17394/39162) |
| 45% (5/6) | Slam W/L | 25% (6/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 42% (13/18) |
| 50% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 70% (7/3) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (50/52) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (176/130) | Challenger W/L | 65% (214/113) |
| 72% (51/20) | Futures W/L | 78% (122/34) |
| 60% (237/395) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (406/650) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (43/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (85/165) |
| 56% (71/126) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (99/199) |
| 87% (224/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (422/367) |
| 12% (224/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (422/55) |
| 25% (180/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (237/47) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
